手机版

Validation methodology from HKMA CA-G-4

发布时间:2021-06-06   来源:未知    
字号:

1. Validation of Rating discriminatory power:

−Cumulative Accuracy Profile (“CAP”) and itssummary index, the Accuracy Ratio (“AR”);−Receiver Operating Characteristic (“ROC”) and itssummary indices, the ROC measure and the PietraIndex;

−Bayesian error rate (“BER”);

−Conditional entropy, Kullback-Leibler distance, andConditional Information Entropy Ratio (“CIER”);

−Information value (“IV”);

−Kendall’s τ and Somers’ D (for shadow ratings);

−Brier score (“BS”); (this is similar to RMSE which we will do in validation)

−Divergence.

Not applicable since we will follow Basel’s rankingand our validation is not on discriminatory power.

2. Validation of PD calibration

−Binomial test with assumption of independentdefault events;

−Binomial test with assumption of non-zero defaultcorrelation;

−Chi-square test.

We will do this validation on the calibration, for the accuracy instead of conservative.

3. Validation of LGD estimates

−Comparisons between internal LGD estimatesand relevant external data sources This may not be applicable since currently in HK and PRC region, no bank has fully completed the IFRS9 modelling work, including HSBC. For bond, the external LGD has been used in IFRS9 model already.

−Comparisons between realised LGD of newdefaulted facilities and their LGD estimates We will do this.

4. Validation of EAD estimates

−back-test their internal EAD estimates against therealised EAD of the new defaulted facilities

We will do this for some segments which Basel EAD will be modified in IFRS9

−Where available, AIs should compare their internalestimates with external benchmarks.

This may not be applicable since currently in HK and PRC region, no bank has fully completed the IFRS9 modelling work, including HSBC.

−compare the estimated aggregate EAD amount forthe subject facility type with the realised aggregateEAD amount for that facility type

We will do this for some segments which Basel EAD will be modified in IFRS9

5. Benchmarking

−HKMA will expect AIs to obtain theirbenchmarks from third parties, provided that relevantexternal benchmarks for a specific portfolio areavailable. When external benchmarks are not used,despite being available, the HKMA will expect AIs toprovide valid justifications and demonstrate that theyhave other compensating measures

Validation methodology from HKMA CA-G-4.doc 将本文的Word文档下载到电脑,方便复制、编辑、收藏和打印
×
二维码
× 游客快捷下载通道(下载后可以自由复制和排版)
VIP包月下载
特价:29 元/月 原价:99元
低至 0.3 元/份 每月下载150
全站内容免费自由复制
VIP包月下载
特价:29 元/月 原价:99元
低至 0.3 元/份 每月下载150
全站内容免费自由复制
注:下载文档有可能出现无法下载或内容有问题,请联系客服协助您处理。
× 常见问题(客服时间:周一到周五 9:30-18:00)