Vernik,Purohit,andDesai:MusicDownloadsandtheFlipSideofDRM
MarketingScience,ArticlesinAdvance,pp.1–17,©2011INFORMS
15
¯ < 2.Indeed,itiseasytoseethatNextweshowthat
R¯ ;hence,itis U / isequalto0with = RLRL
122¯ < ,i.e.,theroot isoutsideofthethecasethat <
feasiblesetofparameters.
R1
Thus URL RL≥0forallfeasible = .Inotherwords,when < 1 ,therecordlabel’spro tdecreaseswitheliminationofDRM,andwhen = 1 ,therecordlabel’spro tincreaseswitheliminationofDRM.
ers.The lemaynotbeermissions@.
Nowcompare(B4)and(B6).NotethatiftheoverallweightedimpactofDRM, ,ispositive,thenourmodelformulationisequivalenttothemodelwhereallconsumersderiveutility R= fromaDRM-restrictedproductwhere = DRM 2 1 .TheweightedimpactofDRM, = DRM 2 1 ,ispositiveif >0 5.
AppendixC.AllowingDirectCompetitionBetweenPiratedDigitalandLegalTraditionalFormats
Let = 1 and = 1 1 .Considerthedif-ferencebetweenrecordlabel’spro tinthecasewhenitsellsDRM-restricteddigitalmusicandthecasewhenitsellsAppendixD.ProofsofPropositions
Proposition1A.With =0,thedifferenceSU SRis
bpircoDRM-freedigitalmusic:
tsbyuc URLLsil RR=A 2
+B +C
oopwhere
tesilbhA= eT 1 +2t eT 1+2 2tal8t +e3+ 1 2 +4t
igTt T nvaiadrB= 2t +eT 1 4eMt +eT 1 eT + 3t+eM
ea +e
Tt 8tT 3+õõ 1
dgaermand
ssnioiC= 1
htsciehu
128e2Mt4
4 e6T 2
1 4 2 9+6
2
wq+16eTe2Mt3
1+ 3 1 3+5 ,ynn 2e3Tt 1 2 2eMt 3 2
+3 1+ 1
oaisrdn 3e2M 1+ 1 3+2 + 2
veese+2t2 24 25 52 + 2+ 24 1
censa+4e2T
t2 2
1 2 46t2 6eMt 3 vaedlAP+e2
M 2 1+ 2 3+ + 9+12 +13 2 ne.iti 2e5T 1 3 eM 2 3 1
sselc’sr+2t 6+ + 9 3 1 2 8 2+2 3
itorAhtu+e4T 1 2 e2M 1 2 2 9+ 2
saih+2eMt 2 3 4 + 2 2 3+2 3
teohtt+2t2 4 11 7 12+ 2 1 18+6 8 1tghngi+ 4 19 2+7 3 idryul /
4eT 2t +eT 1 pc· 3eT+8t eT 2+ 2t +eT 1
onicse,· 3eT +8t eT 2+ dtil
osThedifferenceisquadraticin hbeA<0.
,anditiseasytoseethat
SwMSolvetheequation UrRehtworootsas 1RL R
RL=0for anddenotethe
2
OtFoNy 1B √and :
BB+√BIn a= and 2
:thngoSinceA<0, the2A =difference Uir islocatedbetweenthetwo 2A
RL
RrootsRL
ispositiveifandonlyifofequation;i.e.,
ydpetos UCoRLp RRL≥0 ∈ 1 2
However,thefeasibilitycondition
D
RD
≥0impliesthat
4e + 3t+e =
Mt +eT 1 eTM
≤ ¯
equalto
2SU SR=
1 1 9e2
T eMTeMt 1+ 1 32eMt 1 2
3e3e
TT+8t 1 T +8t 1
ItiseasytoseethatSU<SRaslongas
>
4eMt 3eTT 3eT t eM 4eMt 1
= S
Proposition1B.Thedifference
SU SR= 3e2
T 3eM 1 3t 1 +2
+4eTt 3eM 1 2 + 4+3 1 32t2 eM 1 + 1 2 1 · 2eT 3eT+8t 1 3eT +8t 1 1
islinearanddecreasingin thecutoffpoint
.SolvingSUresultsin SR=0for
2 S 1 9e2
=
T eMTeMt 1+ 1 +32eMt2 1 t 1 e
T +8TProposition2A.Considerthedifference+2t 1
betweentherecordlabel’spro tinthecasewhenitsellsDRM-restricteddigitalmusicandthecasewhenitsellsDRM-freedigitalmusicwith =0:
URL RRL
= 9e4T 2 24e3
Tt 1+ 1 +e2T 9e2
M 18eMt 46t2 1 2
+12eTe2Mt 1+ 1 3+32e2Mt2
1 4·Itiseasyto 4eT 3eT+8t 1 3eT +8t 1 1 seethatthisdifferencehasthesamesign
1
asthenumeratoroftheexpressionabove,whichinturnisquadraticinwithpositivequadraticcoef cient.Hence
URL R
RL<0when ∈ 1 2 ,where
1 A2+48eTe2
Mt 1 3eT +8t 1 2 A1=6eT 3eT+8t 1 and
1 A2 +48eTeMt 1 3eT+8t 1 2 A
2=
2
6e
T 3eT+8t 1
whereA=224e2Tt eT 9e2
M 18eMt 46t2 1 12e2Mt 1
Itiseasytodemonstratethat 1isalwaysnegative;hence, URL> RRLiff > 2.Let 2= .