Leveraging Standard Electronic Business Interfaces to(18)

supply chain management

Malhotra,Gosain,andElSawy:LeveragingSEBIstoEnableAdaptiveSupplyChainPartnershipsInformationSystemsResearch18(3),pp.260–279,©2007INFORMSinformation3.Inourrelationship

sources.witheachotherwiththat partnerisnotcompanyavailable from,weshareother

mation4.In

perspectiveexchangeourrelationshiphelpsuswith partnercompany ,theinfor-

own.thatneitherofprovideuscouldeachhaveotherdevelopedwithauniqueonour

[1=StronglyDisagreeto7=StronglyAgree]

Use

linkedpartner1.ofExtentStandard

companytowhichElectronicBusinessInterfaces(STD)

arethesimilarbusinesstoprocessinterfaceswith

procedures.withotherchannelpartners—inthetermsprocessofinterfacesrulesand

reporting,2.Extent(STD1)

toryproducttowhichinformationexchanged(e.g.,sales

converted/translatedinformation,etc.)information,with partnerproductcompanyavailability, inven-

(STD2)tobeinterpretedbyyourneedscompany.tobe

(e.g.,3.Extent

ability,salesreporting,towhichproductcontentinformation,ofinformationexchanged

caninventoryinformation,etc.)with partnerproductcompanyavail-

otherbepartners.interpreted(STD3)similartoinformationexchangedwith

[1=NotAtAllto7=toaLargeExtent]

CooperativeInNorm

joint1.our relationship nomatterwhowithis partneratfault,companyproblems are considered

itability.2.responsibilities. bothsidesare(CN1)concernedabouteachother’sprof-

(CN3)3. both(CN2)sidesarewillingtomakecooperativechanges.

[1=StronglyDisagreeto7=StronglyAgree]

References

Austin,intheT.A.,puterLee,L.Kopczak.Supply-Chain1997..AndersenUnlockingConsulting.HiddenValue

Barclay,approachD.,C.

useasantoHiggins,

illustration.causalR.modeling:Thomson.1995.Thepartialleastsquares

TechnologyPersonalStud.2computer(2)285–324.adoptionand

Bensaou,ganizationalM.,N.

Japaneseautomakers.relationships:Venkatraman.1995.Con gurationsofinteror-

ManagementAcomparisonSci.41(9)between1471–1492.U.S.and

Boeker,tation:W.,

position.EffectsJ.Goodstein.

anizational

J.34andperformanceadap-

805–826.performanceonboardcom-

Bowker,ConsequencesG.,S.Star..MIT1999.Press,SortingCambridge,ThingsOut:MA.Classi cationandIts

Brennan,adaptationD.R.,P.W.Turnbull,D.T.

37(11/12)1636–1667.inbusiness-to-businessmarkets.Wilson.Eur.2003.J.MarketingDyadic277Brown,nitiesJ.S.,andinnovation.ofPpractice:anizationallearningandcommu-Organ.TowardsSci.a1uni ed40–57.viewofworking,learningBrown,ManagementJ.S.,P.Duguid.Rev.40(1)1998.90–anizingknowledge.CaliforniaBrown,LinkingS.L.,anizations.theory1997.andTheartofcontinuouschange:Admin.timepacedSci.Quart.evolution42(1)in1–33.relent-Brusoni,perspective.S.,an.2006.Sci.17Making(2)179–189.designrules:AmultidomainBurns,UniversityT.,G.M.Press,Stalker.Oxford,1961.TheUK.ManagementofInnovation.OxfordBurt,Press,R.S.New1982.York.TowardaStructuralTheoryofAction.AcademicCannon,businessJ.P.,markets.W.D.Perreault,J.MarketingJr.1999.Res.Buyer-seller36(4)439–460.relationshipsinCarlile,aries:P.R.2002.ApragmaticSci.13Boundary(4)442–455.objectsinnewviewproductofknowledgedevelopment.andbound-Organ.Carlile,an.framework2004.Transferring,Sci.15(5)fortranslating,transforming:Aninte-555–568.managingknowledgeacrossbound-Chandler,MA.A.D.1962.StrategyandStructure.MITPress,Cambridge,Chin,squaresW.W.,B.L.Marcolin,Pactionlatentvariablemodeling.R.Newstead.approach2003.formeasuringApartialinter-leastandtemsaneffects:Res.electronic-mailResultsfrom14(2)189–217.emotion/adoptionaMonteCarlostudy.simulationInform.studySys-Choo,InformationC.W.1998.TheKnowingOrganizations:HowYork.toConstructMeaning.OxfordUniversityOrganizationsPress,NewUseCohen,perspectiveW.M.,D.128–152.onA.learningLevinthal.and1990.innovation.AbsorptiveAdmin.capacity:Sci.Quart.Anew35Cooper,cessR.andG.failure.1979.TheJ.Marketingdimensions43(3)ofindustrial93-103.newproductsuc-D’Aveni,StrategicR.A.Maneuvering1994.Hypercompetition:.FreePress,NewManagingYork.theDynamicsofDay,J.G.MarketingS.1994.58The(4)capabilities37–52.ofmarket-drivenorganizations.Dent,policy:C.2003.Transnationalcapital,thestateicalEconom.Singapore,10(2)246–277.SouthKoreaandTaiwan.andRev.foreignInternat.economicPolit-Dill,development.W.R.1962.Thein94–109.AdministrativeS.Milick,impactofenvironmentonorganizationalBehaviorE..H.Prentice-Hall,VanNess,eds.EnglewoodConceptsCliffs,andIssuesNJ,Dougherty,StrategicD.Management1990.UnderstandingJ.1159–78.newmarketsfornewproducts.Duysters,canConf. rmsG.M.,improveK.H.Heimeriks.their2002.Alliancecapabilities—petence-BasedManagementallianceperformance?,IMD,Lausanne,6thInternat.Switzer-Dyer,petitiveJ.H.1996.Managementadvantage:SpecializedJ.17271–292.Evidencesupplierfromnetworkstheautoasindustry.asourceStrategicofcom-Dyer,imizeJ.H.1997.Effectiveinter- rmcollaboration:How rms

gicManagementtransactionJ.costs18(7)and535–556.maximizetransactionvalue.Strate-min-