西方自由主义契约正义观解析(上海交通大学学报(11)

[16] [英]休谟.《人性论》（下）[M].关文运译，商务印书馆出版社，1980年：509-510.

[17] 王海明.《新伦理学》（修订版）[M].商务印书馆出版社，2008年：301-320.

[18] [德]马克思.《论犹太人问题》[M].《马克思恩格斯全集》第3卷，人民出版社，2002年：184-185.

[19] [奥]凯尔森.《法和国家的一般理论》[M].沈宗灵译，中国大百科全书出版社，1996年：87.

[20] [德]马克思.“《政治经济学批判》导言”[M].《马克思恩格斯选集》第2卷，人民出版社，1995年：2.

[21] [古希腊]亚里士多德.《尼各马可伦理学》[M].廖申白译，商务印书馆出版社，2003年：130.

[22] [英]亚当·斯密.《道德情操论》[M].蒋自强等译，商务印书馆出版社，1997年：106.

The Analysis of West Liberal View of Justice on Contract

——Also on the formation and rationality of the view of justice

Li Shouchu

(School of Marxism , Shanghai Jiao Tong University , Shanghai , 200240, China)

Abstract： Liberalism argues that the justice results from the contract, and that the justice itself has been proven through the contract. This is a wrong opinion about the relation between contract and justice. It is sure for a contract to lead to formal justice, but not sure to substantive justice. Based on the basic principles of value, the substantive justice is derived from the entity of justice through the criterion of justice, without direct relation to the contract.

Key words： contract；formal justice；substantive justice；value